Inside the Mite - a
Study of Wood Deterioration
Part II
Words and
photos by Dick Rank In Part 1, we reviewed typical tail structural problems occurring because of heat and moisture, unavoidable factors in the life of an aircraft, whether wood or metal. In the case of the Mite, these problems revealed themselves early in the fifties and were dealt with by several Factory Service Letters and federal AD's. According to early Mooney, Inc. letters, the Airworthiness Directives became necessary because owners did not make corrections as directed in service letters, resulting in accidents. The best general source materials on necessary repairs are Mooney Service Letters 14, 16 and 17. SL14 outlines procedures for checking play in tail surfaces. SL16 deals with glue deterioration, inspections, disassembly, alterations and repair of empennage, fuselage and wing. SL17 specifies inspection procedures and repairs for the rear fuselage bulkhead. They cover everything we will discuss. It is also advantageous to be familiar with AD's so that you can check the work of certified aircraft and power plant mechanics who work on your aircraft. Most of those documents are available elsewhere at this site. We started with tail surfaces, so lets move "forward" to the fuselage. The Mooney boys' design feature of tail feathers that move together as a "trim" unit is still with us in all new Mooney aircraft. This feature does depend heavily upon the strength of the rear bulkhead to carry stress loads as tail control surfaces are moved to control the aircraft.
On one of the Mites we are currently working on, advanced plywood rot required replacement of two areas of the fuselage at the rear bulkhead. Prior repairs by an A&P unfamiliar with skarf joint techniques required in such repairs, had simply cut the old plywood away on the bottom and glued on a patch (see photo below). When we pulled off the fabric, the patch fell off. The aircraft had lost about 1/3 of its structural strength at that crucial point alone. I suspect that many Mites have been unnecessarily destroyed because of this type of damage. Most of it can be repaired.
Skarf joints require considerable skill, since the two edges of plywood to be joined must be sloped at a ratio of twelve times the plywood thickness, trimmed to insure a tight overlapping joint, glued and clamped. Where possible, they are best supported underneath by an airframe member. If these procedures are followed, the joint is as strong or stronger than the plywood. Visual inspection should reveal the metal reinforcing plates, and glue should have been slightly squeezed out in the inside of the fuselage where the rear bulkhead and plywood meet. If the visible glue at that joint is powdery or crumbly, the strength of the bulkhead-fuselage joint may be compromised. Complete restoration of the fuselage usually requires some plywood replacement and application of filler where the plywood has become "rippled". If rippling is present on many plywood surfaces, this will result in reduction of aircraft speed and efficiency. Coating of both inside and outside of fuselage plywood with epoxy varnish will give excellent protection against future rot and strengthen the plywood to some extent.
Articles by other authors recommend pressing firmly on the exterior fuselage plywood along internal longerons to see if cracking sounds can be heard. This can indicate the need to re-glue longerons to the interior plywood surfaces. However, visual inspection of longeron-fuselage joints will usually reveal any problems there. In Part 3, we can consider the all important wing and its structure. Design of the Mite wing is a work of art, maximizing simplicity, lightness and strength. The Mooneys were very talented designers of wood structures.. |
||||||||||||||||||||
©2001 Richard C. Rank